Nerman Fatic vs Julian Ocleppo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs J. Ocleppo

Nerman Fatic

BIH

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

209

C. Rank

897

191

Best Rank

309

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$7.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Julian Ocleppo

ITA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

209

C. Rank

897

191

Best Rank

309

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$7.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Ocleppo

They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 3 and Julian Ocleppo winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Julian Ocleppo was at the Verona Challenger, 15-08-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 3-0 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	2
Ocleppo	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Verona Challenger(08-15-21)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Julian Ocleppo

(QF) M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula(10-10-19)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Julian Ocleppo

N. Fatic vs J. Ocleppo H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Ocleppo
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$7,255
58.60% (402-284)	Career Total W/L	53.43% (187-163)
2	Clay	0
12	Titles	3
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs J. Ocleppo Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.59% of points on their second serve, while Julian Ocleppo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 44.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Julian Ocleppo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 52.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Julian Ocleppo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 76.92% of matches played (W/L 50/15), with Julian Ocleppo winning 66.67% (W/L 2/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 340/217), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Julian Ocleppo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 13/16).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 24/12), where as Julian Ocleppo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Julian Ocleppo being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 3 and Julian Ocleppo winning 1.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Julian Ocleppo was at the Verona Challenger, 15-08-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 3-0 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:52.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 344.71 while Julian Ocleppo has played against players with an average rank of 460.33.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Julian Ocleppo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 34.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Julian Ocleppo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Julian Ocleppo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs J. Ocleppo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Ocleppo
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	1
21	Games Won	14
3	Aces (Total)	0
2	Total Double Faults	7
1:43:52	Average Match Time	1:43:52
69% (77/112)	1st Serve %	58% (70/120)
66% (51/77)	1st Serve Win %	60% (42/70)
57% (20/35)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (22/50)
57% (8/14)	Break Pts Won %	50% (4/8)
47% (56/120)	Return Points Win %	37% (41/112)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
QF Hugo GrenierH. Grenier	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Carlo Alberto CaniatoC. Alberto	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
R1 Roberto Carballes BaenaR. Carballes	W	6-2 7-5	Stats
Valencia Challenger - 06-10-2025
R1 Marco TrungellitiM. Trungelliti	L	2-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
M25 Zlatibor - 22-09-2025
F Dusan ObradovicD. Obradovic	W	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Ocleppo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Seoul Challenger - 28-10-2024
R1 Kasidit SamrejK. Samrej	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Q3 Jie CuiJ. Cui	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Q1 Alafia AyeniA. Ayeni	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Taipei 2 Challenger - 21-10-2024
R1 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula - 30-09-2024
Q1 Maximilian FiglM. Figl	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs J. Ocleppo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	J. Ocleppo
58.60% (402/284)	YTD Win/Loss	53.43% (187/163)
57.57% (886/653)	Sets Win/Loss	52.59% (416/375)
53.04% (7547/6681)	Games Win/Loss	51.39% (3836/3629)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	61.17% (63/40)
61.04% (340/217)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (98/98)
44.19% (19/24)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.98% (26/25)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.41
1560	Aces Total	1496
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.29
1501	Total Double Faults	1065
1:19:51	Average Match Time	1:24:51
509.7	Average Opponent Rank	513.96
66% (23571/35458)	1st Serve %	61% (12955/21315)
65% (15427/23571)	1st Serve Win %	70% (9006/12955)
48% (5709/11887)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (4092/8360)
47% (1953/4180)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (849/2129)
43% (15481/35816)	Return Points Win %	39% (8285/21092)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	33.33% (1/2)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
53.15% (118/104)	Challenger W/L	38.39% (43/69)
63.30% (276/160)	Futures W/L	61.11% (143/91)
60% (393/659)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (183/342)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
51% (79/154)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (58/111)
54% (102/188)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (52/97)
88% (392/346)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (189/161)
11% (392/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (189/27)
19% (294/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (161/25)